Overwatch 2 Review – Gamereactor

Overwatch 2 Review – Gamereactor

Where to start? This is actually probably the most contradictory thing I’ve ever experienced in terms of game reviews. On the one hand, Overwatch 2 is a top shooter that excels in many ways, but on the other hand, so is Overwatch, which begs the question, can this really be called a sequel? That’s the problem I’m having here, because I want to tell you that Overwatch 2 is great in many ways, but if you’ve played the original, you won’t really notice much of a difference. I am in a dead end. I can understand that since Overwatch is a very competitive multiplayer game, Blizzard Entertainment didn’t want to change the formula too much, but at the same time, this game has been years in the making and the main difference is the monetization effort in the game and some extra content added. Here and there. This is a very strange situation.

At the beginning of the year, I wasn’t afraid to snatch the title with a new title. The lack of new content in the first beta and Blizzard’s limited communication efforts made me really worried about what the game would look like. But then with the announcement that Overwatch 2 is free to play and will have a schedule of seasonal updates that will bring very frequent sets of content — both characters and maps — I’m excited again. We’re at a launch point right now where the latest development comes in the form of monetization efforts and how to offer new characters, and while it annoys some people in the wrong way, it’s basically the same way that many other characters release with heroes Related titles such as Apex. Legends. The game feels like a series of carefully weighted scales, as some Blizzard decisions are great, and some don’t have to offer either – which I find oddly uninteresting. therefore.

If anything, this isn’t a great place to start Overwatch 2, as the original game was pretty good at launch. Granted, it does suffer from time to time, but it starts at a very high level, and if my understanding of how the game and the service model works and how Blizzard aims to run Overwatch 2 is straight forward, we’re heading towards the opposite The situation is on track this time. . A middling game at launch, that will grow into itself over the next few years.

Here is an ad:

Overwatch 2 Review – GamereactorOverwatch 2 Review – Gamereactor
Overwatch 2 Review – GamereactorOverwatch 2 Review – Gamereactor

But again, this is where the problem arises. Overwatch 2, while not a huge improvement over Overwatch, is still a great shooter. It’s smoother than ever, looks stunning, characters feel less oppressive and more skilled, and it’s all built on top of the better game mode effort, available now. Including cross-progress and save. All these things are really great, but don’t define a sequel. That’s what this game really lacks right now. Older players will return to the Overwatch world and discover some changes. Sure it will be fun, but it’s still the core Overwatch experience behind the 5v5 game design. Aside from the major sequels, Blizzard has turned our attention to the PvE side of things, but as an avid and long-time Overwatch player who has followed the game and the franchise over the years and has been part of many PvE modes, I have It’s safe to say this is not what I want. desire or pursuit. In fact, I’m trying to see how this will be the future of Overwatch 2.

Here is an ad:

But that doesn’t change any of the comments, as the PvE aspect makes absolutely no sense since they’re not here. As of now, Overwatch 2 is still a multiplayer online game. Is it better than the original Overwatch? Yes, but these are marginal improvements in the current overall package, and that’s the problem with the field service game. In a year or two, my opinion may be very different, but for now, I can’t tell you that Overwatch 2 is the savior of the Overwatch franchise, because three new characters, a bunch of new maps, new game modes, and some quality changes. Life can be done in stagnant years, as development basically stops on the original game.

There’s no better way to describe Overwatch 2 than just lackluster. Blizzard already had a great formula in the original, and instead of trying to shake things up and make some creative bold choices, we got a sequel that really should be seen as a 2.0 update rather than a successor. At least this time.

Don’t get me wrong, Junker Queen and Kiriko are some of the funniest characters I’ve ever played, and the extra map arrangement makes some older characters look boring. The future looks very bright, with unlimited support planned and a lot to look forward to, but since we’re in the present, I can’t tell you today that this game amazes me, just like the new Overwatch. And only when it was released years ago.

Overwatch 2 Review – Gamereactor

So, should you play Overwatch 2? Absolutely not. It may seem paradoxical to say but whether you’re a fan of the series, or a fan or shooter, or generally stay away from them, you should grab this game and test it because as far as free-to-play titles go, it’s is one of the best – because there’s no denying it. Mostly the same game as Overwatch. But to call Overwatch 2 the sequel and the next phase of the franchise is an exaggeration, there’s no doubt about that. That’s the problem that plagues this game, which is common in the gaming world. If I say the best comparison to Overwatch 2 right now, it’s to sports games like FIFA, because while new installs of these games are still the best in their field, they’re still very similar, if not the same, their predecessors. That’s why it’s impossible for me to tell you that this is a major improvement over the Overwatch world. Maybe in the future, but right now, Overwatch 2 is better described as too safe to be an amazing sequel.